🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic talks with Washington provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations worked, and revealed fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to restart talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is treading a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, Western states used their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in various formats if talks reopen.

Trump in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, intended to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of international law, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the strikes commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and cooperation, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Final Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly attempted to impose their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the final resolution to address disagreements, but its standards, regulations and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will get a answer in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, stays intact. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the government and the state in the wake of this assault."